nanu nano [was Re: Boot fail, please help!]
richard at sc.lug.org.uk
Sun Oct 29 19:53:21 GMT 2006
On Sunday 29 October 2006 18:29, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> Nobody has mentioned ed(1) yet!
> The very basic editor
> that ex and then
> vi are extensions of. It is still there in /bin.
richard at GNU-Mac:~$ ls -l /usr/bin/vi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2006-10-01 11:09 /usr/bin/vi -> /etc/alternatives/vi
richard at GNU-Mac:~$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/vi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-10-01
15:29 /etc/alternatives/vi -> /usr/bin/nano
Disclaimer - jokes are available at the expense of other Unices and editors:
http://duncanpierce.org/articles/Humour/The Emacs Conspiracy
Richard Smedley, Richard at sc.lug.org.uk
Sustainable IT Consultant,
``Software Freedom for the Voluntary Sector''
``Using a free software version of vi is not a sin; it is a penance.''
- Church of Emacs
More information about the Ukfreebsd