cvsup takes too long?
Progga
progga at BengaLinux.Org
Tue Nov 28 22:33:44 GMT 2006
--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:46:11PM +0000, martin at rakupottery.org.uk wrote:
>=20
> >On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:24:59PM +0000, Progga wrote:
> >>
> >>I was updating the ports collection inside a jail using CVSUP
> >>(cvsup2.uk.freebsd.org) 2/3 days ago and it took well over eight hours =
to
> >>complete. Is this normal behaviour?
> >
> >No. I find the .uk cvsup servers a little unreliable though.=20
> >
> >Either way, I expect that you'll find portsnap is better if you don't
> >need an actual CVS ports tree.
>=20
> I stopped using cvsup2 some months ago as it had become terribly slow, ev=
en=20
> at 3am, I now use cvsup.uk.freebsd.org and it is all done in a few minute=
s.=20
Thanks all for the replies.
According to fastest_cvsup:
- 1st: cvsup3.uk.freebsd.org 12.58 ms
- 2st: cvsup4.uk.freebsd.org 14.63 ms
- 3st: cvsup2.uk.freebsd.org 15.98 ms
I have updated again; cvsup3 was really fast and cvsup2 refused access sayi=
ng
"Access Limit Exceeded"!
I am now looking into portsnap. The man page seems to me a bit vague for t=
he
first read unfortunately :-(
--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFbLlIAjLUsitphWkRAj19AKCfnFo0NYQytdrU5Jyxq6Xj0nz03ACgmhJJ
00ig1FmoymAc1WbzqK4hh+0=
=YlHk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24--
More information about the Ukfreebsd
mailing list