/etc and /usr/local/etc
Kevin O'Connor
kevin at ziptek-technologies.co.uk
Tue Jun 20 21:17:53 BST 2006
The simplest answer to this is that this approach separates the add-ons from
the base system install and adds greater flexability.
I can't think of any advantage to installing everything under /etc it just
clutters the volume up
Kevin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: freebsd-users-admin at uk.freebsd.org
> [mailto:freebsd-users-admin at uk.freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Allen
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 8:50 PM
> To: FreeBSD Support Group
> Subject: /etc and /usr/local/etc
>
> As a relative FreeBSD newbie, I get confused between these
> two directories. As I understand it, anything I install
> after the initial installation will user /usr/local/. For
> example, I'm used to seeing /etc/samba/smb.conf but now have
> to go for /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.
>
> How do other people deal with this? Do you live with it
> because that's the way it is. Do you change any parameters
> which make installed stuff write to /etc instead, or perhaps
> create symlinks in /etc to point to the real file in /usr/local/etc?
>
> Many thanks,
> Steve :)
>
> ------ FreeBSD UK Users' Group - Mailing List ------
> http://listserver.uk.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-users
>
More information about the Ukfreebsd
mailing list