Freebsd-users digest, Vol 1 #1823 - 3 msgs

ed joyce edjoycearthurnet at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Mar 23 00:49:39 GMT 2005


Last time I looked at it I came to the conclusion that
FXO/FXS cards would not work on the public network in
the UK (I mean Digium ones - I don't know of any
others) I think its to do with a genuine
incompatability not lack of approval, I was thinking
just to get a SIP server up and running and bouncing a
call through TelAppliant. There has been quite a bit
of interest in a LondonBSD group. I will put a website
up and put the details on the list here so any one who
is interested can find out what is going on

Ed Joyce

 --- freebsd-users-request at uk.freebsd.org wrote: 
> Send Freebsd-users mailing list submissions to
> 	freebsd-users at uk.freebsd.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 
>
http://listserver.uk.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	freebsd-users-request at uk.freebsd.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	freebsd-users-admin at uk.freebsd.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Freebsd-users digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. London BSD User Group now set up (ed joyce)
>    2. Re: London BSD User Group now set up (Aled
> Morris)
>    3. Re: London BSD User Group now set up (Bruce M
> Simpson)
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:20:40 +0000 (GMT)
> From: ed joyce <edjoycearthurnet at yahoo.co.uk>
> Subject: London BSD User Group now set up
> To: freebsd-users at uk.freebsd.org
> 
> The London BSD user group is now set up. We are
> planning to try and install VoIP on a couple of BSD
> systems. We will attempt this sometime in April.
> Anyone interested should e-mail
> edwardtjoyce at yahoo.com
>  
> Regards
> Ed Joyce
> 
> --- freebsd-users-request at uk.freebsd.org wrote: 
> > Send Freebsd-users mailing list submissions to
> > 	freebsd-users at uk.freebsd.org
> > 
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide
> Web,
> > visit
> > 
> >
>
http://listserver.uk.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-users
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> > 'help' to
> > 	freebsd-users-request at uk.freebsd.org
> > 
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > 	freebsd-users-admin at uk.freebsd.org
> > 
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> > is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Freebsd-users digest..."
> > 
> > 
> > Today's Topics:
> > 
> >    1. RE: routing confusion on home network (Kel
> > Graham)
> > 
> > -- __--__-- 
> > 
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:41:12 -0000 (GMT)
> > Subject: RE: routing confusion on home network
> > From: "Kel Graham" <kel at orawia.com>
> > To: freebsd-users at uk.freebsd.org
> > Reply-To: kel at orawia.com
> > 
> > 
> > Kevin O'Connor said:
> > >
> > > Nicely put Lee that is indeed the reason. Can I
> > please have several
> > > glasses
> > > of whatever type of beer you're drinking :-)
> > >
> > > Kel
> > > The Netgear will have a default route to the
> > public IP connection, it
> > > cannot
> > > build a routing table to different subnets( you
> > can only get away with
> > > stuff
> > > like that on layer3 or better switches which
> learn
> > routes via RIP or OSPF)
> > > Unless it's a typo the Gentoo Linux PC (eth0:
> > 192.168.5.2, default route:
> > > 192.168.5.1) should read
> > > Gentoo Linux PC (eth0: 192.168.5.2, default
> route:
> > 192.168.5.3)
> > > As the 192.168.5.3 interface on the FreeBSD box
> is
> > the gateway not the
> > > ADSL
> > > 4-port modem/router.
> > > You also wonder about the Network/sub-net setup.
> > These terms date back to
> > > the early days of TCP/IP when splitting a class
> A,
> > B or C network up into
> > > smaller sub-nets was impossible. hence terms
> like
> > Class A network. However
> > > with the introduction of more advanced network
> > masking (CIDR) it became
> > > possible to split up these standard networks
> into
> > smaller (Sub Net)
> > > segments. As a point of interest it also became
> > possible to join several
> > > Class C networks into a single Class B network
> > (Super net) So the term
> > > Network, subnet and supernet are, from a routing
> > point of view, the same
> > > thing.
> > >
> > > I'd be curious to know why you have this
> > particular setup.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: freebsd-users-admin at uk.freebsd.org
> > [mailto:freebsd-users-
> > >>admin at uk.freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Lee
> Brotherston
> > >>Sent: 15 March 2005 14:37
> > >>To: kel at orawia.com
> > >>Cc: freebsd-users at uk.freebsd.org
> > >>Subject: Re: routing confusion on home network
> > >>
> > >>Kel Graham wrote:
> > >>> ah.. solved it by judicious use of NAT.  Why
> > does FreeBSD say it routes
> > >>> between interfaces with a simple
> > "gateway_enable='YES'", when for me
> > >>> this
> > >>> wasn't the case? Was it because I have two
> > separate networks, and not
> > >>just
> > >>> different subnets?
> > >>
> > >>Hi Kel,
> > >>
> > >>I suspect that the FreeBSD box was infact
> routing
> > the traffic fine,
> > >>however the netgear router had no routes for
> > 192.168.5.0/24 to enable
> > >>the return traffic back (a tcpdump should
> confirm
> > this).  It would need
> > >>a gateway of 192.168.0.26 setting for any
> > 192.168.5.0/24 traffic in the
> > >>router.  Using NAT means that the traffic used
> the
> > address of the
> > >>interface on the FreeBSD machine which the
> router
> > could route too by
> > >>virtue of being on the same subnet.
> > >>
> > >>Wow, did I just type that after beer? :)
> > >>
> > >>   Lee
> > >>
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks for the replies!
> > 
> > Lee: I did in fact set a static route on the
> router,
> > for 192.168.5.0/24 to
> > point to 192.168.0.26.  I think this was working,
> as
> > other 192.168.0.0/24
> > machines could ping all the machines on the
> > 192.168.5.0/24 network.
> > However, as you said, a tcpdump didn't show any
> > packets from 192.168.0.1
> > being returned to 192.168.5.2.
> > 
> > Most confusing!
> > 
> > Kevin: Thanks for the tip on the Linxu PC's
> default
> 
=== message truncated === 

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 




More information about the Ukfreebsd mailing list