setantae at submonkey.net
Fri Sep 3 11:32:03 BST 2004
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:43:19PM -0700, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:16:35PM +0100, Lee Brotherston wrote:
> > Just hoping to tap the collective knowledge pool for this. I'm trying=
> > to think of a way to have a directory that I can access as per usual on=
> > a laptop when off-line or on a remote network, etc. But that will sync=
> > up with a samba or nfs share when sat on the home network (both version=
> > of the file will not change simultaneously so there is no need for=20
> > merging or anything, timestamps would suffice).
> Sounds like what Solaris' CacheFS does. However, we ain't got cachefs.
Does cachefs really cope with the backing file system going away? I ask
because, if it does, then I have a whole new world of stuff I can use it
for. Do you just mount with demandconst or noconst to get this working?
It is not tinfoil, it is my new skin. I am a robot.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Ukfreebsd