5.2 as a workstation?
mark at ukug.uk.freebsd.org
Wed Jan 14 11:41:43 GMT 2004
Pete French wrote:
>> desktop. (4.6.2 is getting decidedly unhip.)
> You still running 4.6.2 ? :-)
>> So. Is anyone here running 5.x as a workstation? How is it?
It works just fine here, although I don't think that SMP is fully
optimized yet. A 5.2 make buildworld takes 32 mins on my new machine
(dual Athlon MP2800, 1GB RAM) whereas 4.9 make buildworld took 53 mins
on my old Athlon 700, 512MB. I know that 5.x is "bigger" than 4.x and so
would take longer _on the same machine_ (anyone built both on the same
machine and can quantify that?) but I would still expect it to be
quicker. The only comparison I have is building Mozilla Firebird on
WinXP which is over four times quicker on the new machine.
> I have tried 5.1 for a while and it was fine. I am also now ttempted
> to put 5.2 onto that little Compaq and see how it goes. Mostly I am
I'll agree with that, and in 5.2 USB keyboards work properly (although
USB wireless MS mice still don't except on the PS/2 port :-( ).
> sticking to 4.9 for mission critical stuff currently it has to
> be said, and hence the desktop systems are mostly 4.9
> If you want to come round when I have had a go at the 5.2 and take a
If you are going to do a source u/g 5.1->5.2 then make sure that you
read src/UPDATING *first* (not after like I did ;-) ). You *MUST* do
''make installkernel'' *and reboot* before doing ''make installworld''
else your system will crash and burn and not restart :-O Thank God for
the ISO images.
> look then you are very welcome to do so...
> ------ FreeBSD UK Users' Group - Mailing List ------
More information about the Ukfreebsd