lou.kamenov at aeye.net
Mon Jan 13 11:07:08 GMT 2003
In some email I received from Peter McGarvey <fbsu-x at packet.org.uk> on
Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:07:47 +0000 :
> * Julian Rawcliffe <julian.rawcliffe at ntlworld.com> [2003-01-12
> 22:59:24 GMT]:
> > On Sunday 12 January 2003 22:06, Peter McGarvey wrote:
> > >
> > > I despise RPMs, and I dislike the wealth of options with the Red
> > > Hat install. Last time I managed to install RH without GCC, and
> > > it took me two days to figure it out. All the Linux gurus in the
> > > office just told me that I should have installed "everything".
I also get frustrated and irritated when i have to use RPM, dselect or
whatever, cause it`s new, it`s different and _NOT_ at all simple, and
i`m afraid to tell or think how complex it is, a whole distribution
depends on it. It`s more about the big SKY system taking over the world
and John Conner fighting with it :) Making the whole thing automated
without worring what`s going to happen if you change `this` or that. i`m
not a linux attorney, but i cant blame it for what you do cause it
simply works (for me, and i suppose i`m not the only one?).
> > RPM is truly awful for system maintenance, especially when
> > app dependency varations kick in. And upgrading RPM in itself can be
> > a nightmare. As a newcomer to FreeBSD (though I started off using
> > SunOS 4.1.3) I love the ports system and upgrading by 'make world'
Do you read Updating, or match your osrelease string or you have a
install which parses it for you and then does the `safe-and-sane`
install. It`s not that easy, not at all.
> > from 4.6 to 4.7 was a breeze. FreeBSD still has a lot of features
> > that the Linux crowd is envious of. I have switched my server and
> > workstation to FreeBSD with no expectation of going back. I've been
> > surprised by the availability of such a rich set of BSD software
> > that I'd only expect in the Linux world.
> > > I love the simplicity of the FreeBSD text installation. Even
> > > though I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2.5, and machines for many
> > > different tasks, I've only needed the "Standard" install.
> > >
> > I saw a great quote in a letter on The Register that said that BSD
> > is for those who love UNIX; Linux is for those that hate Microsoft.
> > If there is a wish for FreeBSD it is that the developers don't lose
> > sight of what a great OS it is and don't become distracted by what
> > Linux appears to offer Windows users.
> All stand foru a chorus of the FreeBSD anthem.
> ...erm, how does it go again?
> > Linux is for those that hate Microsoft
Not exactly i started using Linux from it`s early years, and I dont
think that`s the reason, there _IS_ a reason why everything would be
automated in Red Hat and other GNU/Linux distributions,
think about the TV and the remote control, is that any different?
Are you able to see only the bad side(stories trown out there from god
knows who). I speak for myself, and from what`ve learned from my
experience with both of them.
> I think it's more like that they were looking for an alternative, and
> they had heard of Linux, so went looking, found Red Hat.
Lol, interesting story - here comes the big bad Windows, trowing
off-board Linux and BSD.. not exactly..
> Rather embarasasingly, the first few months of using FreeBSD I was
> under the impression was it was nothing more than a different Linux
Hm, you`re not wrong at all, for years i was trying to see what`s the
thing that makes *BSD (especially FreeBSD) and Slackware GNU/Linux so
close. Simplicity, stability.
it`s only my opinion.
Network Infrastructure/Security Analyst
Lou Kamenov lou.k at hq.aeye.net lou.kamenov at aeye.biz
AEYE R&D - http://www.aeye.net AEYE Commercial - http://www.aeye.biz
phone: +44 (0) 20 8879 9832 fax: +44 (0) 7092 129079
mobile: +44 (0) 79 0551 4036 PGP Key ID - 0xA297084A
AEYE(=AI) stands for Artificial Intelligence.
More information about the Ukfreebsd