AMD K6-2 450 mhz
Tue Jun 11 02:45:08 BST 2002
On 10 Jun 2002 23:53:17 +0100, Paul Richards wrote:
>The K6-2 was not a reliable CPU, depending on which version of the chip
>you have it might be complete trash. AMD screwed up some versions so
>badly that the only solution was for them to replace them on demand.
>I've got a K6-2 that's junk since FreeBSD *always* dies unpredictably
Indeed that is true.
Also, some early K6's did not have important hardware features,
like write combining.
Although i've got two of them, one K6 350 and a K6-2 450, and both
have been working reliably without any problems for many years.
þ H.I.C. & D.B.S. þ OS/2 Warp þ Hellas þ
þ ServerConfig þ ConfigEdit þ OS/2 UK UG þ
þ Sometimes i think there might be more to life þ
þ than having a really really ridiculously fast computer þ
More information about the Ukfreebsd