GXN/Freenetname and bind 8.3

Simon Dick simond at irrelevant.org
Tue Feb 19 13:46:01 GMT 2002


On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 12:46, Steven Fletcher wrote:
> Simple question so I'll cut to the chase:
> 
> Has anyone else noticed that GXN's nameservers (at map{1-4}.dns.gxn.net)
> have been answering queries with... er... shite, recently?
> 
> This only seems to have begun since I upgraded our resolvers to bind
> 8.3.1 (it may have been happening with 8.3.0, but if it was, I didn't
> notice), and apparently might be something to do with EDNSO.
> 
> Example:
> 
> 12:35:13.523915 ns.shellnet.co.uk.4172 > map1.dns.gxn.net.domain:  10372
> [1au] MX? ri-consulting.co.uk. (48)
> 0x0000   4500 004c a0cb 0000 4011 835a c281 d102        E..L.... at ..Z....
> 0x0010   c3e0 ff16 104c 0035 0038 c841 2884 0000        .....L.5.8.A(...
> 0x0020   0001 0000 0000 0001 0d72 692d 636f 6e73        .........ri-cons
> 0x0030   756c 7469 6e67 0263 6f02 756b 0000 0f00        ulting.co.uk....
> 0x0040   0100 0029 1000 0000 0000 0000                  ...)........
> 12:35:13.534570 map1.dns.gxn.net.domain > ns.shellnet.co.uk.4172:  666*-
> [0q] 0/0/0 (12) (DF)
> 0x0000   4500 0028 b0a0 4000 f711 7ca8 c3e0 ff16        E..(.. at ...|.....
> 0x0010   c281 d102 0035 104c 0014 112f 029a 8500        .....5.L.../....
> 0x0020   0000 0000 0000 0000 4854 5450 2f31             ........HTTP/1
> 
> Yes, that is part of a HTTP request in there!
> Countless other examples contain countless other variations on the crap
> that seems to be contained within the reply.
> 
> We're able to reproduce this on 2 different machines, one connected via
> PSInet, the other on UUnet UK. This affects all of the Freenetname
> domains, which are serviced by the above mentioned nameservers.
> 
> Also noticed by Richard Hopkins at the University of Bristol,
> unfortunately, I've asked, but he has been unable to run any tcpdumps so
> that we can compare results:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=a2m16k%24han%40pub3.rc.vix.com&output=gplain
> 
> If anyone is able to reproduce the above, please let me/us know, then at
> least I can be sure that I'm not on my own...

Well, considering the freenetname DNS servers were written in house
there, it's very possible that there's something they don't like with
the latest bind, I know it took ages for them to work with the MS DNS
server. Your best bet would be to send that to the tech support people
and hope it gets passed on to someone in the technie dept (if there's
anyone left there :)





More information about the Ukfreebsd mailing list