SSL wrapping or SSH tunnelling? Which is more secure?

[Nik Clayton]

--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 06:56:20PM +0100, Jonathan Dean wrote:
> Quick question:
> Which method is considered more secure for services such as POP3 and IMAP=
4?
> Making users use ssh tunnels to access the services or wrapping the=20
> services in ssl using stunnel?
> Any views will be greatfully recieved.

I use ssh forwarding, just because it's the approach I found first.
Never had a problem with it.

N
--=20
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve      http://www.freebsd.org/               (__)
FreeBSD Documentation Project    http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/    \\\'',)
                                                                      \/  \=
 ^
   --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F  94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 ---         .\._/=
_)

--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj1hV2gACgkQk6gHZCw343X4KgCfRjawL2nBV9lUsFvvWogZxuoi
21gAmwWL4i17TAVzJMDeEaLn5yFKhYib
=U1uB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--