more RAM + faster disk -> slower box?!
mark at blackmans.org
Thu Nov 29 14:19:57 GMT 2001
Seems to be connected with the Intel 430HX chipset.
This seems far more likely.
> I know that some older motherboards never cached more than the first
> 512MB of memory. This was a particular problem with Windows, because it
> was loaded in to the top of memory. If you had more than 512MB of RAM
> you suddenly discovered that your OS was running in non-cached memory,
> and everything got slower.
> FreeBSD is probably susceptible to the same problems (not sure where the
> OS loads, but given FreeBSD's aggressive use of memory you're going to
> be hitting that top 256MB very soon after boot).
> I don't know whoch motherboards had this problem, but Google can
> probably tell you. It might be worth ripping out 256MB and trying the
> test again.
> FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/
> FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/
> --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 ---
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> Content-Disposition: inline
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> ------ FreeBSD UK Users' Group - Mailing List ------
More information about the Ukfreebsd