Apache 1.3.6 / PHP3
Richard Smith
rdls at jezebel.demon.co.uk
Wed Feb 16 13:06:59 GMT 2000
Paul Civati wrote:
>
> "Wood, Richard" <rich at ruh-bath.swest.nhs.uk> wrote:
>
> > You have to remember that the version numbering method was changed for 3.x.
>
> Guess who didn't realise that. :)
>
> > The 2.? branch was numbered 2.x.y so, release wise, 3.x is the modern
> > equivalent of 2.0.x and 4.x is what would probably have been 2.1.x
>
> But, 4.x is branched from -current, and is not a new release of 3.x, so
> is based on a branch which contains very new sometimes experimental
> code.
<pedantic mode>
4.x is not a branch, it's just a release from the head. 3.x is a branch.
</pedantic mode>
4.x will continue to be -current and 3.x will continue to be -stable
until 5.x is created, then 3.x will suddenly become non-stable.
Far be it from me to second guess a perl script, but I would expect to
see one or two more 3.x releases before 4.x becomes the new -stable
Richard.
More information about the Ukfreebsd
mailing list